How Hidden Beliefs Shape Our Understanding of Life
"The most profound assumptions in science are often the ones we don't know we're making."
What if the bedrock principles guiding biological research—like the primacy of genes or the mechanical nature of cells—were not just observations, but philosophical choices? This isn't mere speculation; it's experimental metaphysics, a field where physics collides with philosophy to test the unspoken frameworks underpinning reality itself. As physicist Eric Cavalcanti argues, "In some sense, the knowledge that we obtain through experimental metaphysics is more secure and more scientific," because it scrutinizes the hidden premises beneath our scientific hypotheses 5 . In biology, these premises are being radically challenged, revealing that developmental processes, evolutionary trajectories, and even consciousness might operate through principles far stranger than previously imagined.
For centuries, biology operated under implicit metaphysical assumptions: organisms as complex machines, genes as ultimate controllers, and reality as purely material. Yet modern experiments—probing bioelectric fields guiding regeneration, quantum effects in photosynthesis, and self-organizing systems in embryos—suggest life cannot be fully explained by mechanical metaphors alone. These discoveries force a confrontation with questions once deemed purely philosophical: What is the nature of agency? Does purpose exist in nature? And how do our own assumptions about reality limit or illuminate the living world? This article explores how cutting-edge biology is becoming a testing ground for metaphysics, revealing that the line between science and philosophy is far blurrier, and far more fertile, than we ever realized.
Born from quantum physics' paradoxes, this field uses laboratory tools to probe philosophical foundations. Cavalcanti and others draw inspiration from John Stewart Bell's theorem (1964), which proved that certain pairs of metaphysical assumptions—like locality (no instantaneous distant influences) and realism (objects have definite properties before measurement)—cannot both hold true in quantum systems 5 . Experiments confirmed quantum predictions, violating Bell's inequality and forcing a choice: abandon locality, abandon realism, or both. This demonstrated that metaphysical frameworks are empirically testable. Biologists now apply similar rigor to assumptions like "agency is unique to humans" or "genes solely determine form."
Developmental biologist Michael Levin challenges the central dogma that DNA is the sole software of life. His work reveals that bioelectric patterns, generated by ion channels and gap junctions in cell networks, act as a pre-patterning system guiding large-scale anatomy. These patterns form a developmental morphospace—a landscape of possible anatomical outcomes 8 .
Alfred North Whitehead's "organic realism" offers a metaphysical framework resonant with these findings. He rejected static materialism, viewing reality as a process of becoming where even fundamental entities possess a degree of experience and aim. Agency isn't magically added at the human level but is a scaled continuum present in all living systems 8 . Levin's observations—like planaria regenerating correct heads after disruption, or engineered "xenobots" exhibiting collective problem-solving—support this view.
Stuart Kauffman's concept of "order for free" highlights how complexity arises spontaneously from physical and chemical principles, not solely through selection. This self-organization is evident in phenomena like the actin cytoskeleton maintaining rigidity homeostasis under stress, or epithelial tissues undergoing large shape changes via collective cell behaviors 3 9 .
Can anatomical outcomes be controlled by overriding genetic instructions and manipulating bioelectric patterns alone?
Experimental Manipulation | Resulting Anatomy | Significance |
---|---|---|
Control (No Manipulation) | Normal Head & Tail | Baseline regeneration |
Hyperpolarize Posterior | Head at Posterior | Overrides genetic identity |
Depolarize Anterior | Tail at Anterior | Overrides genetic identity |
Hyperpolarize Both Ends | Heads at Both Ends | Dictates number of axes |
Anatomy is not solely hard-coded by DNA. Bioelectric patterns act as a master regulator, sitting hierarchically above genetic programs.
Challenges reductionist materialism. Cells are competent agents interpreting physico-informational cues 8 .
Offers paths for regenerative medicine, cancer reprogramming, and synthetic morphology 8 .
Probing the Metaphysical Foundations of Life
The experiments probing bioelectricity, quantum effects in biology, and self-organizing systems are more than just technical triumphs; they signal a profound shift in our metaphysical stance towards life. We are moving away from a biology of passive machinery and towards a biology of inherent agency, dynamic process, and embedded information. As Michael Levin argues, we are continuous with the "mindless" matter of physics and chemistry, undergoing a journey from physics to mind that is observable and, increasingly, manipulable 8 .
This shift resurrects concepts like formal and final cause, not as mystical entities, but as emergent properties of complex, goal-directed systems operating within the laws of physics and geometry.
It offers powerful new levers for control—regenerating tissues, reprogramming tumors, engineering novel living forms—by speaking the language of the bioelectric and morphogenetic codes that orchestrate life.
"Science and philosophy form a single whole." — Alfred North Whitehead 5